MedicalConspiracies- iowa isn't the only state looking to silence animal abuse whistleblowers

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/us/14video.html?_r=2

a.. Reprints
This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order
presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or
customers here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears next to any article.
Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples and additional information. Order a
reprint of this article now.

----------------------------------------------------------

April 13, 2011
States Look to Ban Efforts to Reveal Farm Abuse
By A. G. SULZBERGER
Undercover videos showing grainy, sometimes shocking images of sick or
injured livestock have become a favorite tool of animal rights organizations
to expose what they consider illegal or inhumane treatment of animals.

Made by animal rights advocates posing as farm workers, such videos have
prompted meat recalls, slaughterhouse closings, criminal convictions of
employees and apologies from corporate executives assuring that the
offending images are an aberration.

In Iowa, where agriculture is a dominant force both economically and
politically, such undercover investigations could soon be illegal.

A bill before the Iowa legislature would make it a crime to produce,
distribute or possess photos and video taken without permission at an
agricultural facility. It would also criminalize lying on an application to
work at an agriculture facility "with an intent to commit an act not
authorized by the owner."

Similar legislation is being considered in Florida and Minnesota, part of a
broader effort by large agricultural companies to pre-emptively block the
kind of investigations that have left their operations uncomfortably - and
unpredictably - open to scrutiny.

Their opponents, including national groups that oppose industrial farming
practices, say these undercover investigations have been invaluable for
revealing problems and are a form of whistle-blowing that should be
protected. They argue that the legislation, if passed, would essentially
hide animal abuse and food safety violations.

Wayne Pacelle, the executive director of the Humane Society of the United
States, noted that secretly recorded videos released last year revealed
unsanitary conditions inside egg plants in Iowa. Months later, a different
Iowa egg producer was responsible for the largest egg recall in United
States history because of salmonella contamination.

"It's because they don't want you to see what's going on that we've resorted
to employee investigations," Mr. Pacelle said.

Kevin Vinchattle, chief executive of the Iowa Poultry Association, which
helped write the bill, suggested that those willing to lie on an application
might go further and stage fake videos, destroy equipment or carry diseases
onto farms. He could not provide any examples of those things ever
occurring.

"If they misrepresent themselves to come on your operation to do something
that's not in your best interest, they ought to be held accountable for
that," Mr. Vinchattle said.

The Iowa bill was approved by a wide margin by the House and was passed by
the Senate Agriculture Committee. It stalled after the attorney general's
office raised concerns that prohibiting the possession and distribution of
images - a measure intended to prevent animal rights groups from using them
for fund-raising - infringed on free speech. Supporters are working on
compromise language.

The use of undercover investigations to expose abuse in agriculture dates
back more than a century. The journalist Upton Sinclair spent weeks working
in meatpacking plants while researching his book "The Jungle," and his
graphic descriptions of unsanitary conditions prompted federal regulation of
the industry.

In recent years, such investigations have increased, along with concerns
among consumers about certain industrial farming methods. In Iowa, which is
the nation's largest producer of eggs and pork, several major producers have
been targets.

After a 2008 investigation of an Iowa pig farm showed workers beating sows
and piglets as well as bragging about the abuse, People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals turned over its unedited video to law enforcement,
leading to criminal convictions against workers for animal abuse, said Jeff
Kerr, general counsel for the organization.

Rose Acre Farms, an egg producer based in Indiana, did not realize that it
had been infiltrated until the Humane Society called a news conference a
year ago.

The spy was identified as a young man who had worked 15 days caring for the
hens at egg producing facilities in Madison County, Iowa. He had been quiet
and diligent and then stopped showing up.

Afterward, the company realized that his application mixed truth and lies.
He gave his real name and Social Security number. But he listed false
references, which the company had not called. And he circled "No" when asked
if he was "a member of, associated with, or connected in any way with any
organization that could be considered an animal rights group."

The man, who agreed to be interviewed under the condition that his name not
be used, was an employee of the Humane Society. Although he found the work
disturbing - he keeps a mostly vegan diet - he said he did what he was asked
while recording videos for up to two hours a day with a hidden camera.

"My purpose there isn't to interfere or do anything, my purpose there is to
work and record," he said. "My purpose is to be the eyes and ears of the
public."

That video showed rows of crowded wire cages, some containing injured and
disfigured hens, as well as rotting, dead birds. Employees were seen
throwing the birds into bins and talking about how their wings or legs
sometimes fell off in the process.

But the company said the video was misleading. It cut many hours of images
into just a few minutes and cut back and forth between farms operated by two
companies. Among hundreds of thousands of egg-laying hens, sick and dead
birds are inevitable, they said. No one alleged a crime had been committed.

Rose Acre Farms did not fire a single employee, though it did institute more
extensive background checks for new workers, said Joe Miller, general
counsel for the company. "It was a bogus film," he added.

The association representing egg producers helped draft legislation to ban
such videos, earning support from other powerful agricultural groups in
Iowa.

"People are scared to death that they might be found in a compromising
position," said Craig Lang, a dairy farmer who is president of the Iowa Farm
Bureau, which supports the bill.

The legislation has been strongly backed by Republicans but has also won
some Democrats. John P. Kibbie, Democrat of Emmetsburg and president of the
State Senate, who has been working on an amended bill expected to be
released this week, said he supported the legislation to "make producers
feel more comfortable."

"Agriculture is what Iowa is all about," Mr. Kibbie said. "Our economy would
be in the tank, big time, if it wasn't for agriculture."

Senator Matthew W. McCoy, Democrat of Des Moines, who has introduced
amendments to weaken or block the bill, said he was worried that it would
open Iowa to abuses that could jeopardize food quality and undermine the
very agricultural interests supporting the legislation.

"If they have nothing to hide and they are operating ethically, they should
have no fear," Mr. McCoy said.