Tuesday, September 29, 2015

MedicalConspiracies- India Permits Free Energy Technology Despite Threats From UK, US, Saudi Arabia | World Truth.TV

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Multi-D News India Permits Free Energy Technology Despite Threats From UK, US, Saudi Arabia | World Truth.TV
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:55:56 -0400
From: 'k.r. ladubec'


MedicalConspiracies- Fast Food Restaurants Get Fail Rating in Antibiotics in Meat

Majority of Fast Food Restaurants Get Fail Rating in Antibiotics Meat Report

September 29, 2015 | 170,760 views
| Disponible en Español

By Dr. Mercola

Antibiotic resistance has been declared "an increasingly serious threat to global public health that requires action across all government sectors and society" by the World Health Organization (WHO).1

The cause for this growing drug resistance was once thought to be restricted to overuse of antibiotics in medicine, but it's become quite clear that our food supply significantly contributes to the problem.

In fact, it may even be the overriding factor that has allowed, and continues to allow, resistance to grow and spread at the rate that it is.

In the US, animals raised in confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are routinely fed low doses of antibiotics to make them grow fatter, faster, and to prevent disease associated with crowded and unsanitary living conditions.

The US uses nearly 30 million pounds of antibiotics each year to raise food animals.2,3 This accounts for about 80 percent of all antibiotics used in the US,4 and nearly 70 percent of these antibiotics are considered "medically important" for humans.5

Globally, antibiotic use in both medicine and agriculture rose by 30 percent between 2000 and 2010, according to newly released data from the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy.6

Along with it, antibiotic resistance has shot up as well. On a positive note, in countries that have implemented regulations to curb the use of antibiotics, certain drug resistant infections have dramatically dropped.

No matter where you live, what farmers are saving on the front end by using antibiotics instead of costlier alternatives (such as using essential oils,7 and feeding them a higher quality species-appropriate diet), consumers pay for on the back end, via exorbitant health care costs and lives cut short.

In the US alone, the price tag for antibiotic resistance is $20 billion in additional annual health care costs,8 and an estimated 23,000 Americans die from antibiotic-resistant infections each year.

Fast Food Restaurants Show Few Signs of Change

Efforts have been made to curtail the use of antibiotics in meat production, but so far, the industry is falling far short of making a dent in the situation.

According to a new report9,10,11 "Chain Reaction: How Restaurants Rate on Reducing the Use of Antibiotics in Their Meat Supply," produced by six consumer interest, public health, and environmental organizations, most fast food restaurants are still serving meat and poultry raised on antibiotics.

Most also lack a publicly available policy to limit the use of such meats. Of the 25 restaurant chains included in the report, the following 20 received a "Failing" score: 

Subway Starbucks KFC Domino's Pizza
Wendy's Burger King Denny's Olive Garden
Papa John's Taco Bell Pizza Hut Applebee's
Sonic Chili's Jack in the Box Arby's
Dairy Queen IHOP Outback Little Caesars

Only Two Fast Food Restaurants Earned an 'A' Grade

Chipotle's and Panera Bread both earned "A" ratings. According to the report, they are the only two fast food restaurants that publicly affirm the majority of the meats served come from antibiotic-free producers.

One-third of Panera's turkey and 100 percent of its pork and chicken is antibiotic-free. The company is also reviewing its policy for beef, although its primary beef supplier does not use antibiotics, and its secondary supplier uses antibiotics for medical necessity only.

Chipotle's policy prohibits routine use of antibiotics, and the company states this policy applies to at least 90 percent of all meats served. As for the remaining three restaurants, the report notes that:

"Chick-fil-A and McDonald's have established policies limiting antibiotic use in their chicken with implementation timelines, while Dunkin' Donuts has a policy covering all meats but has no reported timeline for implementation."

One in four Americans eats some type of fast food on a daily basis,12 and nearly half of the money Americans spend on food is spent on restaurant meals.13

When you consider that, it's easy to see that this widespread resistance among restaurants to reduce antibiotics in their meat supply chains can have a significant impact on mounting drug resistance, and take an increasing toll on human health.

It's been estimated that some two million Americans are infected with antibiotic resistant bacteria each year. In addition to hard-to-treat infections, overexposure to antibiotics has also been implicated as a factor that can raise your risk of developing diabetes in subsequent years.14

This Can Have Significant Influence on Agricultural Practices

It's important to realize that every time you eat meat from animals raised on antibiotics, you're getting a small dose that, over time with regular consumption, can upset your gut flora and have a notable impact on your weight and metabolism15 — and that's over and above the issue of antibiotic resistance.

As noted in the Chain Reaction report:16

"When livestock producers administer antibiotics routinely to their flocks and herds, bacteria can develop resistance, thrive, and even spread to our communities, contributing to the larger problem of antibiotic resistance.

The worsening epidemic of resistance means that antibiotics may not work when we need them most: when our kids contract a staph infection (MRSA), or our parents get a life-threatening pneumonia...

Most top US chain restaurants have so far failed to effectively respond to this growing public health threat by publicly adopting policies restricting routine antibiotic use by their meat suppliers...

Restaurant companies should also encourage producers to improve animal diets and management practices within their facilities, as this reduces the reliance on routine drug use for disease prevention."

Why Eating Antibiotic-Free Meat Matters

The vast majority of meat and animal products such as dairy and eggs sold in the US — both in grocery stores and restaurants — come from animals raised in confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). The way in which these animals are fed and raised significantly alters and diminishes the quality of the food. The use of antibiotics just makes a bad situation worse, by promoting drug resistance on top of inferior nutrition.

In 2011, researchers found about half of all meats and poultry sold in grocery stores were contaminated with drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the bacteria that causes most staph infections. Now, a new Consumer Report study17,18,19,20,21,22 warns that all store-bought ground beef contains fecal bacteria, and factory farmed beef often contains dangerous antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well.

Consumer Reports purchased 300 packages of ground beef from 103 stores in 26 cities across the US. The beef samples (181 conventionally raised, 116 more sustainably produced, including organic grass-fed) were analyzed for the presence of five types of disease-causing bacteria. The samples were also put through secondary testing to ascertain whether the bacteria were resistant to antibiotics used in human medicine.

Their results showed that:

  • 100 percent of all ground beef samples contained bacteria associated with fecal contamination (enterococcus and/or nontoxin-producing E. coli). In humans, these bacteria can cause blood or urinary tract infections
  • Nearly 20 percent contained Clostridium perfringens, a bacteria responsible for an estimated one million cases of food poisoning each year in the US
  • 10 percent contained a toxin-producing strain of Staphylococcus aureus, which cannot be destroyed even with thorough cooking 
  • One percent contained salmonella, which is responsible for an estimated 1.2 million illnesses and 450 deaths in the US each year
  • Three of the conventional samples had methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which kills nearly 19,000 people each year.23, 24 None of the sustainably raised beef samples contained MRSA

Grass-Fed and Organic Meats Pose Fewer Health Risks

Overall, Consumer Reports found that beef from animals raised in CAFOs was more likely to be contaminated with bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant bacteria, compared to beef from sustainably raised animals. Eighteen percent of the CAFO ground beef samples contained antibiotic-resistant superbugs resistant to three or more antibiotics, compared to nine percent of sustainably produced beef, and just six percent of the grass-fed beef.  

According to Urvashi Rangan, executive director of the Center for Food Safety and Sustainability at Consumer Reports:25

"We know that sustainable methods are better for the environment and more humane to animals. But our tests also show that these methods can produce ground beef that poses fewer public health risks...This study is significant, because it's among the largest scientific studies to show that sustainable methods of raising cattle can produce cleaner and safer ground beef... We suggest that you choose what's labeled 'grass-fed organic beef' whenever you can..."

Do keep in mind, however, that even grass-fed beef is more prone to carry potentially hazardous bacteria than steaks, so always cook ground beef through and through. The reason why ground beef tends to be far more problematic than solid cuts of meat is because on a steak, the bacteria tend to remain on the surface of the meat. Once you cook it, most of the bacteria are destroyed.

When the meat is ground, any bacteria present on top of the meat get mixed throughout the meat, contaminating all of it. So if you like your hamburger on the rare side, the pathogens may still be alive and well in the center of the beef patty.

Another contributing factor is the fact that in the making of ground beef, meat from a number of animals is mixed together, and all you need is for one contaminated animal to affect a very large batch of meat. Moreover, there is a limited number of meat processing plants, so opportunity arises for cross contamination to occur as meat from various farms is run through the machinery.

Grass-Fed Beef Is Also Nutritionally Superior

Besides reducing the risk for bacterial overgrowth and antibiotic resistance, feeding animals a species-appropriate diet (which for cows means grazing on grass, opposed to grains laced with antibiotics) profoundly improves the nutritional quality of their meat. It also virtually eliminates toxins such as glyphosate and other pesticides, which is the other side of the healthy-diet equation.

In 2009, a joint research project between the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Clemson University determined the numerous ways grass-fed beef beats grain-fed beef for your health. In a side-by-side comparison, they determined that grass-fed beef was superior in the following ways:26

Higher in total omega-3s Higher in the B-vitamins thiamin and riboflavin
A healthier ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids (1.65 vs. 4.84) Higher in the minerals calcium, magnesium, and potassium
Higher in CLA (cis-9 trans-11), a potential cancer fighter Higher in vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol)
Higher in vaccenic acid (which can be transformed into CLA) Higher in beta-carotene

When shopping for beef, keep the following labels in mind to help you find high-quality products.27 And remember, your safest alternative is both organic and grass-fed.

100% USDA Organic label offers excellent assurance that antibiotics have not been used at any stage of production.
"No antibiotics administered" and similar labels also offer high assurance that antibiotics have not been used, especially if accompanied by a "USDA process Verified" shield.
"Grass-fed" label coupled with USDA Organic label means no antibiotics have been used, but if the "grass-fed" label appears alone, antibiotics may have been given.
"American Grass-fed" and "Food Alliance Grass-fed" labels indicate that in addition to having been raised on grass, the animal in question received no antibiotics. This is the best label of all but is in the early stages of development so you will likely not see it widely until next year.
The following three labels: "Antibiotic-free," "No antibiotic residues," and "No antibiotic growth promotants," have not been approved by the USDA and may be misleading if not outright fraudulent.
"Natural" or "All-Natural" is completely meaningless and has no bearing on whether or not the animal was raised according to organic principles. "Natural" meat and poultry products can by law receive antibiotics, hormones, and genetically engineered grains, and can be raised in CAFOs.

To Eat Well, Eat More Meals at Home

The foods you eat can be a major source of chronic low-dose exposure to antibiotics, and to protect your health you need to buy antibiotic-free, organically raised meat. Chipotle and Panera's appear to be doing a good job providing their customers with healthier meats, but your best long-term bet is to pick up a good cookbook and start cooking more of your own meals.

Connect with a local farmer that raises animals according to organic standards, allowing them to roam freely on pasture. Some grocery chains also offer 100 percent grass-fed meats these days, as do some small organic restaurants. Still, such eateries can be hard to come by, and for most people the best solution is to buy the meat, and cook it at home, along with other fresh (preferably organic) foods. In the US, the following organizations can help you locate farm-fresh foods:

Weston Price Foundation28 has local chapters in most states, and many of them are connected with buying clubs in which you can easily purchase organic foods, including grass fed raw dairy products like milk and butter.
Local Harvest – This Web site will help you find farmers' markets, family farms, and other sources of sustainably grown food in your area where you can buy produce, grass-fed meats, and many other goodies.
Farmers' Markets – A national listing of farmers' markets.
Eat Well Guide: Wholesome Food from Healthy Animals – The Eat Well Guide is a free online directory of sustainably raised meat, poultry, dairy, and eggs from farms, stores, restaurants, inns, and hotels, and online outlets in the United States and Canada.
Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture (CISA) – CISA is dedicated to sustaining agriculture and promoting the products of small farms.
FoodRoutes – The FoodRoutes "Find Good Food" map can help you connect with local farmers to find the freshest, tastiest food possible. On their interactive map, you can find a listing for local farmers, CSAs, and markets near yo

MedicalConspiracies- Sign the petition: Cat killer shouldn't be a vet

A Texas veterinarian killed a pet cat with a bow and arrow and bragged about it on social media! The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners needs to suspend her license permanently! Sign the Care2 petition today!

Suspend vet Kristen Lindsey's license permanently!


"The only good feral tomcat is one with an arrow through its head!"

It's shocking to think that any veterinarian could proudly kill an innocent cat, let alone post a selfie and brag about it on social media. Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened in Texas last week. Sign S.E.'s petition urging the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners to suspend Dr. Kristen Lindsey's vet license permanently!

Even worse, the woman was wrong about the cat, who is thought to be Tiger, a 6 year old pet tabby that went missing the day the photo was posted to Facebook.

The woman lost her job immediately, but it is clear she lacks the proper judgement and temperment to practice veterinary medicine. She should be investigated and barred from practicing veterinary medicine in the State of Texas as an assurance to pet owners and a sign that animal cruelty will not be tolerated.

Vets are who we turn to when our beloved pets are suffering and in need of help. I couldn't imagine seeking support from a woman capable of such animal cruelty. We trust our pets with veterinarians every day with the knowledge that licensing boards evaluate candidates carefully for both characters and competency. The thought of leaving our animals in the care of people who will treat them this inhumanely and viciously is terrifying.

Veterinarians suspected of animal cruelty should be investigated thoroughly, and their licenses should be suspended if warranted. Such is the case for Kristin Lindsey, who killed an innocent cat.

Help seek justice for Tiger, and sign the Care2 petition urging the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners to suspend her license immediately!

Thanks for taking action!

  Aaron V
The Care2 Petitions Team, Inc.
275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, CA 94065

Sunday, September 27, 2015

MedicalConspiracies- Is Big Pharma Murdering Our Cutting-Edge Doctors?,,Yes, Of Course They Are...

more at:

 Is Big Pharma Murdering Our Cutting-Edge Doctors?
Yes, Of Course They Are...

    The Bolen Report is the archive for the infamous "Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter," Health Care Crisis Management Consultant, and Consumer Activist, Tim Bolen's RUTHLESS, but humorous, analysis of North America's Health Care System.

Of Course I'm Anti-Vaccine...  I Have a Brain.   2/6/15

It is Time to Stop This Vaccine Nonsense...  It is all One Monstrous Horror Show...  2/17/15

It Is Time To Kill The Drug Lord Vampires... Get out the Silver Bullets.  Sharpen the Wooden Stakes.  Grab Some Garlic.  Let's Go Hunting... We Need to Save Our Children... 2/25/15

It is Time To End the US Vaccine Program...  This Dangerous "Vaccine Construction" Needs to be Disassembled... We Need to Save Our Nation...  3/12/15

Mandatory Vaccinations?  FEMA Camps?  Dystopia - the End Result...  3/25/15

Democrats Sell California Children For Campaign Money...  Merck Bought the California Senate Health Committee Vote  - 6 to 2.  California "NO on SB277" Groups, Formerly Stumbling, Now Involved In Major Assault... 4/17/15
The Battle of Bull Run...  The Second American Civil War Has Begun...  And It Started Over Vaccines... 4/21/15

Merck's "Mandatory Vaccine" Program Backfiring Nationwide...  California, However, is, As Yet, Screwed Up...  California "NO on SB277" Groups Grinding Away...  5/1/15
The Mercky Truth About Mandatory Vaccine Legislation...  The US Vaccine Program is On it's Ass - Shock In It's Eyes...  Mandatory Vaccine Legislation, like California's SB277, Is a Last Ditch Effort To Save a Totally Worthless Project - Vaccines, and Everything They Claim to Stand For... 5/28/16

California's SB277 - Huge Fight Not Over...  Despite Major Push by Mega-Funded Proponents - SB277 NOT a Sure Thing  "Controlled Opposition" Complaints Showered on Health Choice/Canary Party's "No on SB277" Group 6/26/15

Anger Builds...  Is An Armed Revolution Imminent in California?  Sacramento is Ground Zero - Will the Democrats Bring in Storm Troopers to Attack Mothers and Vaccine Damaged Children?  Probably...Or, Has the US Supreme Court Already ruled in OUR Favor? 6/30/15

What Would the California Legislature Have Done If They Had Been Told the Truth About Vaccines?  The SB277 Quandary... 7/19/15

Is Big Pharma Murdering Our Cutting-Edge Doctors?

Yes, Of Course They Are...

Why?  They've Tried Everything Else to Control the Dialogue...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate  Tim Bolen

Saturday, September 26th, 2015


Depending on who you read, the number of cutting-edge (non-drug) health professionals dying under suspicious circumstances varies, but is rapidly increasing.  The last doctor, 59 year-old Mitch Gaynor MD, a personal friend, and regular guest interview, of TV Doctor Oz , supposedly committed suicide in his back yard of his country home.

Bullshit - Gaynor was at the top of his game.  My thinking?  Gaynor was murdered, openly, as a message for Oz.  What message?  "Shut the fuck up, or you're next."

Virtually every one of the doctors that died under "suspicious circumstances" have commonalities - the largest of which is an anti-vaccine stance. But that's not everything...

Friends and family of Jeffrey Bradstreet MD are absolutely positive that Bradstreet's death, labeled suicide by a corn-pone half-baked, average 80 IQ, police department in bum-fuck, nowhere, know better.  The family has hired an attorney and a private investigator to get to the bottom of it.  They are being blocked by that same police, in their investigation.  Are you surprised?   The local cops are probably too busy ordering their new armored vehicles, surveillance cameras, crates of automatic weapons, flame throwers, and injecting each other with the latest blue rage, "bulk-up," steroids to answer a few simple questions.

Bradstreet was, just before his murder, a guest speaker at Autism One, talking about the REAL INGREDIENTS IN VACCINES.  One-plus-one equals two.

Nicholas Gonzalez MD, my friend from New York City, died under "suspicious circumstances" at 67 years old, supposedly of a heart attack.  However, his autopsy shows no reason why he would have had any heart attack.

No reason...

Is it happening?  Yes, it is.  We all need to be on the lookout.

Are there reasons to murder these people?


Bradstreet was right on target and saying, openly, "Vaccines are NOT what we think they are..." and was laying out what was, and is, really happening.

Gaynor was just down the street from Oz - the man they can't shut up.

Nick Gonzalez was another one they couldn't stop, despite every trick to discredit him.  Why?  Nick had, and has, the cure for pancreatic cancer.  Period.  No question.  People diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, across the US, found that, if they stayed locally they lived for six weeks.  If they contacted Nick, they attended their grandchildren's weddings 30 years later.  It was that simple - and the word gets out despite the best efforts of Big Pharma's disinformation campaigns.

But, I don't think it was Nick's cancer work that got him killed.  He'd been doing that for ages.  I think it was this letter I am about to show you.  Why is this letter of maximum importance?  Because Nick was a media savvy Conservative Republican DOCTOR nationally speaking on a vaccine issue - and, as we know, the Republicans have taken an anti-vaccine stance in the upcoming Presidential Election.

Given time, Nick would have been invited to speak to Republican caucuses, and because of his view, as a professional, would have made Trump, and the other Republican candidates EVEN MORE ANTI-VACCINE then they are now.  More, after those Republicans came out with their statements in the Republican debate, Nick, being right there in Manhattan, would have been the "go-to guy" for all of the media.   And, Nick was VERY GOOD at media.  Remember his Larry King interviews?

Big Pharma is very worried about losing the vaccine debate.  But, would they murder people over it?  Of course they would.  Look what they've already done.

The Letter to DHHS That Got Nick Gonzalez Killed...

Dear Ms. Fish:

I am a physician practicing in New York, a graduate of Brown, post-grad work at Columbia, medical school at Cornell, fellowship in cancer immunology under Robert A Good, MD, PhD, for years President of Sloan-Kettering and the "Father of Modern Immunology".

I have reached the age of 67 years old, had only polio and tetanus vaccines as a child.  I follow good nutritional practices, am in superb health with no minor or major diseases past or present and no infections over the past 60 years except a rare cold.

I am very troubled that the DHHS is now trying to implement forced vaccination schedules not only on children, but on adults.  Most of these vaccinations as you must know have not been tested either for safety or efficacy.  The most recent flu vaccine as I have read and believe to be the case was tested for neither safety nor efficacy but got passed through the FDA, perhaps because of drug company lobbying.

I survived the usual childhood illnesses without a problem as did my many friends and schoolmates,and believe firmly as a trained immunologist that these mild infections helped my immune systems mature.  I think this obsession with avoiding the usual childhood illnesses unnecessary and perhaps counterproductive.  Even the dreaded polio, as it turns out through epidemiological investigations, was in most people a mild infection no more serious than a cold.  Studies from the late 1940s showed that in urban areas up to 95% of the populations were positive for polio antibodies, yet with no history of any significant infection and certainly no neurological disability.  Yet it's estimated that up to 40 million Americans may now be infected with the SV40 cancer virus as a result of contaminated polio vaccines.  Was this risk worth the grand scheme to inoculate everyone for a disease than in most, despite government hysteria, was rarely a serious problem?

For most children as in my case and in the case of all my young friends at the time of my own infection, these childhood illnesses passed with no serious or lasting deficits.  However, the same can no longer be said about vaccinations and the damage they cause.  For example, if vaccinations are so safe, why has the government set up a "Vaccine Court" to pay out damage claims to victims of vaccination related disability, to this date amounting to billions.

There is no question autism rates are skyrocketing.  When I was in medical school in the 1980s it was such a rare condition my professors spent maybe 5 minutes on it, advising us we would most likely never see a case in our professional lifetime.  Now, it's estimated that perhaps up to 1 in 50 male children may be afflicted.  Something is changing, and if it isn't the explosion of vaccinations, perhaps you can come up with a better idea.  And this belief the only reason rates are higher is because now we are so smart we diagnose it better to today is nonsense;  autism, with its head banging and obsessive behavior patterns was as easy to diagnose 30 years ago as it is today.

Vaccines still contain aluminum and mercury, both neurotoxins, and no one has yet proven they are safe as adjuvants.  I've not found that controlled peer reviewed study.

The recent claims of fraud at the CDC over autism rates linked to vaccinations raise serious questions about the integrity of government scientists promoting vaccinations.

Vaccinations must remain optional, for the safety and health of our children.

Objective scientific studies on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations, not controlled by the manufacturers must be encouraged.

Wishful thinking on the part of vaccination proponents claiming safety and efficacy often with no data must be reported for what it is, non-science.

Adults and the parents of children must, in this country of all countries where individual liberty is so valued, be allowed to make their own intelligent choices about their bodies, and about vaccinations.

Benjamin Rush, MD, one of the leading Founding Fathers, a great physician in his day, warned that government involvement in health care decisions was a danger, to individual and societal health.  He helped design provisions, like the Fourth Amendment, to protect us from government intrusion in our bodies and our health decisions.  You should take this seriously.

American survived quite well without mandated vaccinations for children and adults, and we will survive better without such mandates.

The government knows these vaccinations carry serious and dangerous risks, or they never would have set up the Vaccine Court.  This isn't that difficult a concept to understand. And if the government by inference acknowledges this as they do in the Vaccine Court, how can the same government then force us to be vaccinated putting our health and lives and the health and lives of our cherished children in danger?

There are already deaths being reported from Gardisil.  The heavy promotion of this vaccination in children for a problem, cervical cancer, that is relatively minor and easily treated, is unwarranted and may very well open up the door to greater danger than the problem being addressed.

Please stop the drive for mandates.  Though well intentioned such thinking is scientifically misguided, potentially dangerous, and potentially putting the health of millions at risk.  If people want to undertake the risk of vaccinations, the risk of contamination with things such as the SV40 virus, if they're ok with the the intake of neurotoxic aluminum and mercury, then great, let them be vaccinated.  But please, for those of us like myself, a trained research scientist, who see no need to be "protected" but see reasonable danger in vaccinations, we must be allowed to avoid enforced intrusion into our lives, and our health.

Thank you for your consideration.


Nicholas Gonzalez, MD

But Why Would Big Pharma Kill Them?

Several reasons...

The main reason is that what Big Pharma is currently doing to keep the vaccine hoax alive, although costing them a fortune, is not working.  There is a very real danger that the whole program is about to collapse - and, of course, that is exactly what needs to happen.
(1)  The veracity of vaccines, and the "Vaccine Construction," itself, made up of a consortium of what are called "stakeholders:" vaccine manufacturers, Federal and State agencies, and so-called public interest groups, is very much an issue in the US right now.    Notably, there are no vaccine victim groups ever invited into the dialogue.

Because of pressures exerted by competent opponents, I think,  the Vaccine Construction is on the verge of destruction.  And, the credibility  of the entire vaccine program is coming up in the national elections just like I said it would.

The fights they lost in individual States over making vaccines mandatory was a huge shock, I think, to the "Vaccine Construction."  They thought they owned the argument - and their only real success, and that argument is FAR from over, was in California.  The Vaccine Construction was in shock over the losses in the other States.  For them this cannot continue.  It had to be stopped.  There were REAL health professionals speaking to those State legislators.  And those legislators were obviously listening.

Big Pharma's current campaigns are not working that well.

(2)  Sharyl Attkisson, recently, at the University of Nevada, pointed out Big Pharma's astroturf (fake grass roots) media campaign strategy.  There is a video.  Go watch it. People simply are NOT buying into astroturf anymore.  Real health professionals speaking out against vaccines are a huge threat.

(3)  Jeffry John Aufderheide, at, recently gutted a major astroturf organization "Voices For Vaccines," in his article "Voices for Vaccines: 11 Facts Show How it's a Propaganda Ploy for Emory University, CDC, and Big Pharma."

"Voices For Vaccines" tried to portray itself as "two mothers, one of which (snort here) claims to have grown up unvaccinated, only to see the light..." Jeffry's careful research shows details of what is really happening and who actually owns and runs the "Voices For Vaccines" website.

(4)  Big Pharma's use of angry homosexual "skeptics" to troll the internet and focus, and transfer, their personal self-loathing at specified targets isn't working that well anymore either.  People just ignore them.  One of the skeptic organizations has already lost their funding. These days they are simply offensive and ineffective.

(5)  Then there are those pesky Republicans.

Why did the Republicans take up this anti-vaccine banner?  It was inevitable.  Republicans are about family values - so what happens to children is important to the Party.  Democrats are into Big Government telling you what to do.  The Democrats have OPENLY declared that America's children DO NOT BELONG TO THE PARENTS but to the government.  Look at what happened in California with the Democratic Party controlled legislature and governor Jerry Brownshirt with the mandatory vaccinations bills.

What Effect Are These Murders Having?

Quite a bit.  They are shutting people up.

For one thing, I lost the sources for a dynamite article on how bad vaccines really are.  My sources were, and are, I think, terrified of being murdered themselves - NEXT.  They called me a few days ago and begged off, claiming "their attorney advises against this..."

What their attorney meant was, I think, "I don't need dead clients."

What was the article about?  Three things:

(1)  The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) is little known to vaccine damaged families and their attorneys.  In essence, the VSD is a data base following millions of children from their first vaccine experience to the present.  It covers twenty five (25) years of continuous individual medical records all across the US.

The information within it is kept from public view, and as independent researchers, in California, have recently found out - (a)  that data clearly shows a SIGNIFICANT relationship between vaccines and children's health problems - perhaps tens of thousands of times more than is being admitted to.  (b)  The participants in the study, it appears to me, are well aware of this and are hiding these facts so as to get "mandatory vaccines" in place in California and across the US.

(2)  "Fake" studies, it appears, using the VSD data, have been written by "friendly" contractors, concluding the opposite of what the data really shows.  When questioned, the authors of the "fake" studies will not produce their data sets for examination.  Those authors get, according to records, an average 800 million dollars a year in "research grants" from Big Pharma and the CDC.  You can read more about the VSD, and how it is SUPPOSED to work, here.  The insert is a US map of Participating VSD Healthcare Organizations.

(3)  The independent researchers, once the VSD local participants found out what they were finding out, had their access to the VSD cut off.

For my purposes there is adequate documentation of what actually happened.  I've had parts of it read to me. More, the independent research was done in California, and involved California children, following what happened to each of them (thousands in the studies), for twenty to twenty-five years.

Twenty to twenty-five years of undeniable evidence of damage.  With this, I intended to provide the evidence basis to destroy the US vaccine program.  But, apparently, my sources don't want to be another suicide statistic.

Let me Be Blunt...

This information, from those independent researchers, in the hands of the "No on SB277" campaigners, would reverse the mandatory vaccine programs for all time, not just in California, but everywhere.

But the independent researchers don't want to be murdered...

Can't say as I blame them.


Stay tuned.

Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate
- See more at:

Saturday, September 26, 2015

MedicalConspiracies- Shape Mag - You Have a Cloud of Bacteria Around You All the Time