skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Pages
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
MedicalConspiracies- Is the Universe a Simulation? Scientists Debate
http://www.space.com/32543-universe-a-simulation-asimov-debate.html
Is the Universe a Simulation? Scientists Debate
By Sarah Lewin, Staff Writer | April 12, 2016 07:33am ET
Is the Universe a Simulation? Scientists Debate
The 17th annual Isaac Asimov Debate at New York's American Museum of
Natural History sold out in just 3 minutes online, host Neil deGrasse
Tyson told the audience. The debate featured five experts chewing on the
idea of the universe as a simulation.
Credit: AMNH/R. Mickens.
NEW YORK — Is the universe just an enormous, fantastically complex
simulation? If so, how could we find out, and what would that knowledge
mean for humanity?
These were the big questions that a group of scientists, as well as one
philosopher, tackled on April 5 during the 17th annual Isaac Asimov
Debate here at the American Museum of Natural History. The event honors
Asimov, the visionary science-fiction writer, by inviting experts in
diverse fields to discuss pressing questions on the scientific frontiers.
Neil deGrasse Tyson, director of the museum's Hayden Planetarium and
host of this year's event, invited five intellectuals to the stage to
share their unique perspectives on the problem: Zohreh Davoudi, a
nuclear physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT);
Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT whose recent book probes the universe
as mathematics; James Gates, a physicist at the University of Maryland
who discovered strange, error-correcting codes deep in the equations of
supersymmetry; Lisa Randall, a physicist at Harvard University who
thinks the simulation question is more or less irrelevant; and David
Chalmers, a philosopher at New York University who regularly questions
the reality that conscious minds perceive. [7 Surprising Things About
the Universe]
How can we tell?
Humanity might never be able to prove with certainty whether the
universe is simulated, Chalmers said.
"There's certainly not going to be conclusive experimental proof that
we're not in a simulation," he said near the start of the debate. "Any
evidence we could ever get would be simulated!"
But other panelists said that, if the simulated universe has similar
physical limitations to our perceived real universe — in which something
infinitely complicated cannot be modeled without infinite resources —
signs of shortcuts and approximations may lurk in our own world, the way
an image breaks up into its constituent pixels when you get close enough
to a screen.
--
--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Alternative Medicine info: http://www.elementsofhealth.webs.com/
"ClayAdvantage" The Gift of Health http://ClayAdvantage.com/
Holistic Store: http://www.holisticenergystore.com/
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related,
speculation or opinion. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
FDA and FTC have not evaluated or endorsed any message or product from this group. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to medicalconspiracies+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Is the Universe a Simulation? Scientists Debate
By Sarah Lewin, Staff Writer | April 12, 2016 07:33am ET
Is the Universe a Simulation? Scientists Debate
The 17th annual Isaac Asimov Debate at New York's American Museum of
Natural History sold out in just 3 minutes online, host Neil deGrasse
Tyson told the audience. The debate featured five experts chewing on the
idea of the universe as a simulation.
Credit: AMNH/R. Mickens.
NEW YORK — Is the universe just an enormous, fantastically complex
simulation? If so, how could we find out, and what would that knowledge
mean for humanity?
These were the big questions that a group of scientists, as well as one
philosopher, tackled on April 5 during the 17th annual Isaac Asimov
Debate here at the American Museum of Natural History. The event honors
Asimov, the visionary science-fiction writer, by inviting experts in
diverse fields to discuss pressing questions on the scientific frontiers.
Neil deGrasse Tyson, director of the museum's Hayden Planetarium and
host of this year's event, invited five intellectuals to the stage to
share their unique perspectives on the problem: Zohreh Davoudi, a
nuclear physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT);
Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT whose recent book probes the universe
as mathematics; James Gates, a physicist at the University of Maryland
who discovered strange, error-correcting codes deep in the equations of
supersymmetry; Lisa Randall, a physicist at Harvard University who
thinks the simulation question is more or less irrelevant; and David
Chalmers, a philosopher at New York University who regularly questions
the reality that conscious minds perceive. [7 Surprising Things About
the Universe]
How can we tell?
Humanity might never be able to prove with certainty whether the
universe is simulated, Chalmers said.
"There's certainly not going to be conclusive experimental proof that
we're not in a simulation," he said near the start of the debate. "Any
evidence we could ever get would be simulated!"
But other panelists said that, if the simulated universe has similar
physical limitations to our perceived real universe — in which something
infinitely complicated cannot be modeled without infinite resources —
signs of shortcuts and approximations may lurk in our own world, the way
an image breaks up into its constituent pixels when you get close enough
to a screen.
--
--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Alternative Medicine info: http://www.elementsofhealth.webs.com/
"ClayAdvantage" The Gift of Health http://ClayAdvantage.com/
Holistic Store: http://www.holisticenergystore.com/
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related,
speculation or opinion. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
FDA and FTC have not evaluated or endorsed any message or product from this group. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to medicalconspiracies+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- June 2017 (14)
- May 2017 (12)
- April 2017 (32)
- March 2017 (24)
- February 2017 (17)
- January 2017 (28)
- December 2016 (24)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (38)
- September 2016 (33)
- August 2016 (41)
- July 2016 (45)
- June 2016 (25)
- May 2016 (31)
- April 2016 (78)
- March 2016 (70)
- February 2016 (43)
- January 2016 (72)
- December 2015 (84)
- November 2015 (95)
- October 2015 (77)
- September 2015 (62)
- August 2015 (57)
- July 2015 (54)
- June 2015 (63)
- May 2015 (103)
- April 2015 (53)
- March 2015 (32)
- February 2015 (28)
- January 2015 (37)
- December 2014 (64)
- November 2014 (68)
- October 2014 (79)
- September 2014 (109)
- August 2014 (72)
- July 2014 (62)
- June 2014 (64)
- May 2014 (45)
- April 2014 (47)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (103)
- January 2014 (115)
- December 2013 (101)
- November 2013 (123)
- October 2013 (120)
- September 2013 (112)
- August 2013 (149)
- July 2013 (106)
- June 2013 (161)
- May 2013 (173)
- April 2013 (175)
- March 2013 (202)
- February 2013 (104)
- January 2013 (57)
- November 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (109)
- March 2012 (106)
- February 2012 (132)
- January 2012 (180)
- December 2011 (92)
- November 2011 (130)
- October 2011 (143)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (69)
- June 2011 (128)
- May 2011 (151)
- April 2011 (143)
- March 2011 (155)
- February 2011 (118)
- January 2011 (159)
- December 2010 (194)
- November 2010 (215)
- October 2010 (217)
- September 2010 (198)
- August 2010 (261)
- July 2010 (251)
- June 2010 (312)
- May 2010 (354)
- April 2010 (113)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.