FOR ALL THE PREDICTING I DO BASED THE ACCUMULATION OF MANY ARTICLES, FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES, ON THE SAME TOPICS... ONCE AGAIN IT LOOKS LIKE I WAS RIGHT ON THE MONEY. SADLY, EVEN PEOPLE WHO READ THIS POST STILL WON'T "GET" THE SEVERITY OF THE SITUATION.
I'VE ALMOST ALL BUT GIVEN UP TRYING TO GET THE TRUTH OUT THERE. PEOPLE SEEM MORE INTERESTED IN SHARING PICTURES THAN READING FOR KNOWLEDGE. PICTURES WON'T INFORM THE "LOW INFORMATION VOTER." FACTS WILL, BUT EVEN THOSE WHO AGREE WITH ME WOULD RATHER SHARE PICTURES THAN KNOWLEDGE. I KNOW BECAUSE I SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE READ EACH POST.
THE FACT THAT 20 DIFFERENT ARTICLES ON THE PETRODOLLAR WERE SHARED MAYBE A TOTAL OF 10x THE OTHER DAY SAYS IT ALL. THAT IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF THE DAY... AND FEW ARE WILLING TO TAKE THE TIME TO SPARE 10 MINUTES TO BECOME MORE INFORMED.
I WROTE THE FOLLOWING ON OCTOBER 11th, 2013:
Thank God for the Internet and blogging, otherwise so many of these stories would never see the light of day if we all depended solely on the major networks to be actual "journalists" and report REAL news to us. Instead all we get is propoganda... pick your side. Much of what I say or theorize I'm sure seems like PURE FICTION to the average Obamabot who just parrots Obama's every word, never bothering to verify anything he says with facts. If it rhymes or fits on a bumper sticker, that's about the gist of what the average Obama voter chooses to process.
The average Obamabot is completely unaware "Barack Obama is a born and bred member of the left and not coincidentally is the most brazen and compulsive liar ever to occupy the American White House. What other politician could have successfully explained away the fact that two of his closest political confidantes over a twenty-year period were an anti-American racist, Jeremiah Wright and an anti-American terrorist William Ayers?" Why? Because they get their news by watching what Barrack says, and never bother to see if what he says matches up with what he does. Even when they find out he's lied, or to sound less harsh, when they find out his words and actions do not match, the uber left-wing media makes excuses for him so team O just buys right in. Give them the new bumper sticker and you've got their vote.
From even the youngest ages, it's infused in the newer generations not to think for themselves or to question, but rather to do as they are told. They are not taught how to think, they are told what to think. Any doubts I am right can easily be proven by spending a few hours in a public school or university classroom. I'm 38 and I remember how overt it was in schools even when I was growing up, and we never had "President Carols" where we sang about a President by name. Even back in the "old days" we talked about the office of the President, and were required to memorize and recite portions of the Constitution as early as the 4th grade. Call me crazy, but I'm be willing to bet memorizing the Constitution is not part of the "Common Core" agenda. I'll let Peter give you the basics in the informative, yet hysterical video below, then I'll put the finishing touches on why we are headed toward a one-party socialist system, and it's not "years away" with time to fix. It will be here by the time we swear in our next President.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
So, Peter talks about the idiot vote. To their credit, it's not entirely their fault they're idiots. First, the public school system makes SURE not to teach civics in any responsible or comprehensive manner, if they even teach it all anymore. Second, unless you're taught why "free stuff" is actually the most "expensive stuff" you've ever owned, it's tough to argue for the candidate telling you cut-backs and fiscal responsibility are best for you when the other candidate is promising to send you a check because it will be a "better country" if income is more "fairly" distributed among us all. All the words sound good right? Free sounds good. Fair sounds good. Getting a check sounds good. Who is that candidate saying we all need to cut back anyway? No way he's getting my vote.
The problem, is by the time Barrack Obama leaves office, if he stays on his current pace of adding new people to government programs, there will be more households getting checks from the government than those not getting checks. Come voting time, who is going to vote for the guy promising to take their check? Forgive me if I'm not too optimistic. In just two terms, Barrack Obama will have effectively blocked out the GOP from EVER having a seat in the White House again. Yes, I said EVER. Of course there will still be a GOP, but in short order they will be as relevant to the national political system as the Green Party or the Libertarian Party. The United States will be a one-party Leftist/Communist party bred and spawned from the father of lies, and his eight year reign: Barrack Obama.
BELOW IS AN ATICLE DATED MAY 9th, 2014:
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
At the end of his taxpayer-funded fundraising spree in Silicon Valley, Obama told supporters at his $32,400 per plate dinner that Republicans shouldn't be allowed to run either chamber of Congress because of their
opposition to his signature healthcare law.
"I can't explain it, why they're so obsessed that those folks don't have health insurance," Obama said. "But we're on the right side of history on that issue. But if that's all they got, then they shouldn't be running either chamber. They shouldn't be running the House and they sure should not be running the Senate."
If you remember correctly, it was that same one party rule that allowed Obamacare to be passed to begin with, so why wouldn't he want that? Having his agenda unobstructed by the party that represents a majority of America? Who could have that, certainly not Obama because he hates opposition.
The he made an exceptional point about Democrats, saying they have a "congenital defect when it comes to our politics" because they don't vote during the midterms. He's right about the congenital defect, now if only they would stop voting in presidential elections as well we would be all set.
Unfortunately for Obama and his progressive followers, poll after poll shows that it's likely they're going to be ousted from both houses of Congress come the mid-terms, and God willing in 2016 they lose the presidency as well.
Here's to hoping, right?
SO, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?
THE BIG DEAL IS THAT IF OBAMA IS NOT STOPPED VIA THE GOP TAKING THE SENATE, AND A SUBSEQUENT ARREST OR IMPEACHMENT, THE DAMAGE HE WILL HAVE ACCOMPLISHED WILL BE IRREVERSABLE. AMERICA AS YOU KNOW IT WILL BE GONE, GONE, GONE!!!
YOU EITHER "GET" THAT, OR YOU DON'T. VERY FEW DO RIGHT NOW... BUT THEY WILL... ONLY IT WILL BE TOO LATE BY THEN.
EVEN IF... IF... THE GOP CAN TAKE BACK THE WHTE HOUSE, I PREDICT IT WILL BE THE LAST TIME THEY DO SO. IF HILLARY OR SOME OTHER LIBERAL NUTJOB GETS IN THERE AGAIN AFTER OBAMA, THEN I STAND BY MY STATEMENT ON OCTOBER 11th: WE WILL NEVER, EVER, SEE ANOTHER GOP PRESIDENT, AND WE'LL BE ON OUR WAY TO THE ONE PARTY SYSTEM I WARNED ABOUT, AND OBAMA IS CALLING FOR.
ALSO NOTICE THE SHARE BUTTONS AT THE BOTTOM AND TWEET BUTTON AT THE TOP OF THE ARTICLE TO GET THIS OUT TO OTHER AMERICANS.
THE 2014 MIDTERM ELECTIONS ARE RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.