skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Pages
Saturday, November 23, 2013
MedicalConspiracies- Dump It in the Ocean: TEPCO's Plan for Radioactive Fukushima Water
In an INANE NEWS NETWORK EXCLUSIVE, TEPCO has, today, announced
its new Fukushima pre cooked seafood dinners. Just buy and eat, no
cooking necessary. Because they glow, you will always find them,
especially in the dark, when your electricity fails. Featured, is
their new barbequed sushi. YUMMY !!!!!
WARNING ! Eating Fukushima seafood dinners may cause nausea, vomiting,
hair and skin loss, significantly reduced life span and premature death !
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/11/20-4
Dump It in the Ocean: TEPCO's Plan for Radioactive Fukushima Water
'There's no risk to public health and safety,' pronounces consultant working for the nuclear plant's owner
- Andrea Germanos, staff writer
An IAEA representative observes TEPCO subcontractors collecting sea water samples near the Fukushima plant on 7 Nov. 2013. (Photo: IAEA/David Osborn)A nuclear expert helping with the clean-up at the crisis-stricken Fukushima plant has joined a chorus of voices saying that all the accumulating radioactive waste water must eventually be dumped into the ocean.
Speaking with Australia's ABC, Dale Klein, former head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and current head of the Nuclear Reform Monitoring Committee hired by plant operator TEPCO, described the situation at the plant as "challenging."
Massive amounts of radioactive water used to cool the reactors continue to build up daily in hastily built storage tanks, some which have already leaked, creating an unsustainable scenario.
Eventually, Klein told ABC, that water must be treated to reduce its radioactivity and then dumped into he ocean.
"At the end of the day, when the water is discharged, it will be released in a way that it's diluted," he said.
"So there's no risk to public health and safety. But it's an emotional issue."
More mishaps at Fukushima, like when a rat chewed wiring and caused a power outage, are likely to come, Klein warned.
"I think we will see more of those. When you look at that site, it's massive," he said.
"It's a big site and it's not unusual to have other things like that," he told ABC.
Klein's comments that the waste water will head to the ocean echo those that Lake Barrett, a former NRC official who also serves on TEPCO's committee, offered in an op-ed in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in September.
Barrett wrote that
Spending billions and billions of yen on building tanks to try to capture almost every drop of water on the site is unsustainable, wasteful, and counterproductive. Such a program cannot continue indefinitely. [...]
I see no realistic alternative to a program that cleans up water with improved processing systems so it meets very protective Japanese release standards and then, after public discussion, conducts an independently confirmed, controlled release to the sea.
Also among those calling for the water to be dumped into the ocean is Shunichi Tanaka, head of Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority, who said in September, "I'm afraid that it is unavoidable to dump or release the water into the sea."
Meanwhile at the crippled nuclear plant, workers this week began a risky yet pressing operation to remove over 1300 fuel rods from Reactor 4.
Explaining why the removal is dangerous yet must be done, nuclear expert Dr. Arjun Makhijani told The Real News Network's Jaisal Noor:
Now, the spent fuel pool number four at Fukushima, which is in question currently, has the most spent fuel of any of the damaged reactors. And the building itself is damaged. And if it is left there, there may be another earthquake. And if the spent fuel pool is destroyed in the next earthquake, there could be a much more severe environmental catastrophe than there was in 2011, in some ways, because the long-lived radioactive material in the spent fuel is more than what was emitted during that accident. I'm talking about long-lived material—cesium, strontium, and so on.
So I believe it is very important to empty spent fuel pool number four especially and put that spent fuel in safer storage.
Look, there's no low-risk solution to this problem. Leaving it there is a significant risk, and removing it also involves significant risks. The spent fuel may be difficult to dislodge because it's no longer in its proper original position. The fuel rods may break, and the fuel may wind up at the bottom of the reactor in the spent fuel pool. There may be an accident of criticality. I haven't examined their plans in detail, but I do think it is very essential to remove this spent fuel, because in my judgment, the bigger danger is leaving it there and waiting for the earthquake to happen. [...]
These pools are sitting high up in the building, and above them there are cranes that move above the spent fuel pools and reactors that transfer fresh fuel into the reactor and used fuel out of the reactor into a pool. So these are pretty heavy pieces of equipment. And those frames were destroyed, along, you know, with the building infrastructure on which they were constructed. So they've had to build a whole new basically impromptu infrastructure to handle this spent fuel that—one hopes that is as precise as the other one, but it's doubtful whether it can replicate the precision of the old, original crane, which could go back and forth above the pool. But it is—you know, they have actually built some kind of a structure, protective structure, not like the original containment. And they also have built a new crane and remote handling for the fuel.
____________________________________________________________
Do THIS before eating carbs (every time)
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar & decrease fat storage
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/529111c04b1c211c010c4st03vuc
--
--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Alternative Medicine info: http://www.elementsofhealth.webs.com/
"ClayAdvantage" The Gift of Health http://ClayAdvantage.com/
Holistic Store: http://www.holisticenergystore.com/
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related,
speculation or opinion. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
FDA and FTC have not evaluated or endorsed any message or product from this group. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to medicalconspiracies+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
its new Fukushima pre cooked seafood dinners. Just buy and eat, no
cooking necessary. Because they glow, you will always find them,
especially in the dark, when your electricity fails. Featured, is
their new barbequed sushi. YUMMY !!!!!
WARNING ! Eating Fukushima seafood dinners may cause nausea, vomiting,
hair and skin loss, significantly reduced life span and premature death !
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/11/20-4
Dump It in the Ocean: TEPCO's Plan for Radioactive Fukushima Water
'There's no risk to public health and safety,' pronounces consultant working for the nuclear plant's owner
- Andrea Germanos, staff writer
An IAEA representative observes TEPCO subcontractors collecting sea water samples near the Fukushima plant on 7 Nov. 2013. (Photo: IAEA/David Osborn)A nuclear expert helping with the clean-up at the crisis-stricken Fukushima plant has joined a chorus of voices saying that all the accumulating radioactive waste water must eventually be dumped into the ocean.
Speaking with Australia's ABC, Dale Klein, former head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and current head of the Nuclear Reform Monitoring Committee hired by plant operator TEPCO, described the situation at the plant as "challenging."
Massive amounts of radioactive water used to cool the reactors continue to build up daily in hastily built storage tanks, some which have already leaked, creating an unsustainable scenario.
Eventually, Klein told ABC, that water must be treated to reduce its radioactivity and then dumped into he ocean.
"At the end of the day, when the water is discharged, it will be released in a way that it's diluted," he said.
"So there's no risk to public health and safety. But it's an emotional issue."
More mishaps at Fukushima, like when a rat chewed wiring and caused a power outage, are likely to come, Klein warned.
"I think we will see more of those. When you look at that site, it's massive," he said.
"It's a big site and it's not unusual to have other things like that," he told ABC.
Klein's comments that the waste water will head to the ocean echo those that Lake Barrett, a former NRC official who also serves on TEPCO's committee, offered in an op-ed in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in September.
Barrett wrote that
Spending billions and billions of yen on building tanks to try to capture almost every drop of water on the site is unsustainable, wasteful, and counterproductive. Such a program cannot continue indefinitely. [...]
I see no realistic alternative to a program that cleans up water with improved processing systems so it meets very protective Japanese release standards and then, after public discussion, conducts an independently confirmed, controlled release to the sea.
Also among those calling for the water to be dumped into the ocean is Shunichi Tanaka, head of Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority, who said in September, "I'm afraid that it is unavoidable to dump or release the water into the sea."
Meanwhile at the crippled nuclear plant, workers this week began a risky yet pressing operation to remove over 1300 fuel rods from Reactor 4.
Explaining why the removal is dangerous yet must be done, nuclear expert Dr. Arjun Makhijani told The Real News Network's Jaisal Noor:
Now, the spent fuel pool number four at Fukushima, which is in question currently, has the most spent fuel of any of the damaged reactors. And the building itself is damaged. And if it is left there, there may be another earthquake. And if the spent fuel pool is destroyed in the next earthquake, there could be a much more severe environmental catastrophe than there was in 2011, in some ways, because the long-lived radioactive material in the spent fuel is more than what was emitted during that accident. I'm talking about long-lived material—cesium, strontium, and so on.
So I believe it is very important to empty spent fuel pool number four especially and put that spent fuel in safer storage.
Look, there's no low-risk solution to this problem. Leaving it there is a significant risk, and removing it also involves significant risks. The spent fuel may be difficult to dislodge because it's no longer in its proper original position. The fuel rods may break, and the fuel may wind up at the bottom of the reactor in the spent fuel pool. There may be an accident of criticality. I haven't examined their plans in detail, but I do think it is very essential to remove this spent fuel, because in my judgment, the bigger danger is leaving it there and waiting for the earthquake to happen. [...]
These pools are sitting high up in the building, and above them there are cranes that move above the spent fuel pools and reactors that transfer fresh fuel into the reactor and used fuel out of the reactor into a pool. So these are pretty heavy pieces of equipment. And those frames were destroyed, along, you know, with the building infrastructure on which they were constructed. So they've had to build a whole new basically impromptu infrastructure to handle this spent fuel that—one hopes that is as precise as the other one, but it's doubtful whether it can replicate the precision of the old, original crane, which could go back and forth above the pool. But it is—you know, they have actually built some kind of a structure, protective structure, not like the original containment. And they also have built a new crane and remote handling for the fuel.
____________________________________________________________
Do THIS before eating carbs (every time)
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar & decrease fat storage
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/529111c04b1c211c010c4st03vuc
--
--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Alternative Medicine info: http://www.elementsofhealth.webs.com/
"ClayAdvantage" The Gift of Health http://ClayAdvantage.com/
Holistic Store: http://www.holisticenergystore.com/
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related,
speculation or opinion. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
FDA and FTC have not evaluated or endorsed any message or product from this group. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to medicalconspiracies+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- June 2017 (14)
- May 2017 (12)
- April 2017 (32)
- March 2017 (24)
- February 2017 (17)
- January 2017 (28)
- December 2016 (24)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (38)
- September 2016 (33)
- August 2016 (41)
- July 2016 (45)
- June 2016 (25)
- May 2016 (31)
- April 2016 (78)
- March 2016 (70)
- February 2016 (43)
- January 2016 (72)
- December 2015 (84)
- November 2015 (95)
- October 2015 (77)
- September 2015 (62)
- August 2015 (57)
- July 2015 (54)
- June 2015 (63)
- May 2015 (103)
- April 2015 (53)
- March 2015 (32)
- February 2015 (28)
- January 2015 (37)
- December 2014 (64)
- November 2014 (68)
- October 2014 (79)
- September 2014 (109)
- August 2014 (72)
- July 2014 (62)
- June 2014 (64)
- May 2014 (45)
- April 2014 (47)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (103)
- January 2014 (115)
- December 2013 (101)
- November 2013 (123)
- October 2013 (120)
- September 2013 (112)
- August 2013 (149)
- July 2013 (106)
- June 2013 (161)
- May 2013 (173)
- April 2013 (175)
- March 2013 (202)
- February 2013 (104)
- January 2013 (57)
- November 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (109)
- March 2012 (106)
- February 2012 (132)
- January 2012 (180)
- December 2011 (92)
- November 2011 (130)
- October 2011 (143)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (69)
- June 2011 (128)
- May 2011 (151)
- April 2011 (143)
- March 2011 (155)
- February 2011 (118)
- January 2011 (159)
- December 2010 (194)
- November 2010 (215)
- October 2010 (217)
- September 2010 (198)
- August 2010 (261)
- July 2010 (251)
- June 2010 (312)
- May 2010 (354)
- April 2010 (113)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.