Senate Deal with Anti-Gun Republicans Would Impose Even More Gun Bans
Gun Owners of America Senate "Deal" Would ImposeEven More Gun BansGifts, gun raffles and multiple sales of guns would be effectively bannedThursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee will mark up four bills arising out of the Newtown tragedy:* The Feinstein bill — which would ban millions of shotguns, rifles, handguns and magazines that Americans can legally own -- but which will probably die on the Senate floor.* The universal gun registry — which may also die on the Senate floor — unless a last-minute deal with Sen. Tom Coburn brings it to life.* Legislation by Barbara Boxer, which throws away $100,000,000 on school safety studies, but doesn't immediately mention guns.* And, currently the biggest danger, the Leahy-Gillibrand-Kirk bill, which has ominously been labeled a "gun trafficking" bill.In regard to this latter piece of legislation (S. 443), the bill is being sold inside the Beltway as a bipartisan "compromise" because anti-gun Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) is a cosponsor of it.But S. 443 would dramatically threaten to put gun owners in jail with horrendously long sentences for the most minor of infractions.Essentially, the bill would impose a 15-year prison sentence for "negligent multiple sales by a dealer," "negligent gifting" or "negligent raffling."Increasingly, there are more and more individuals who are "prohibited persons" for non-violent reasons — for instance, they smoke marijuana or they are military veterans suffering from maladies such as PTSD.But if S. 443 is passed, any person who sells to such prohibited persons two or more firearms ... or gives them a firearm as a gift ... or raffles a firearm (where they are the recipient) ... does so only at the considerable risk of spending 15 years in a federal penitentiary.You don't need to know the person is a prohibited person under either example. Nor does the recipient need to know they're a prohibited person.In fact, you don't need to do anything more than plan ("conspire") to transfer the gun. In addition, the recipient doesn't need to be on the NICS list to be a prohibited person.Not only that, under section 4 of the bill, if you even "intend" to sell a firearm to a person who turns out to be a marijuana smoker — or one of the prohibited military veterans suffering from PTSD — you become a prohibited person yourself.When all is said and done, this bipartisan "compromise" is as bad as the Feinstein gun ban (S. 150).
Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will bounce back as undeliverable.
Please forward this e-mail to friends and familyGun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151703-321-8585
www.gunowners.org
Contact FormIf you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Pages
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
MedicalConspiracies- Fw: Senate Deal with Anti-Gun Republicans Would Impose Even More Gun Bans
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- June 2017 (14)
- May 2017 (12)
- April 2017 (32)
- March 2017 (24)
- February 2017 (17)
- January 2017 (28)
- December 2016 (24)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (38)
- September 2016 (33)
- August 2016 (41)
- July 2016 (45)
- June 2016 (25)
- May 2016 (31)
- April 2016 (78)
- March 2016 (70)
- February 2016 (43)
- January 2016 (72)
- December 2015 (84)
- November 2015 (95)
- October 2015 (77)
- September 2015 (62)
- August 2015 (57)
- July 2015 (54)
- June 2015 (63)
- May 2015 (103)
- April 2015 (53)
- March 2015 (32)
- February 2015 (28)
- January 2015 (37)
- December 2014 (64)
- November 2014 (68)
- October 2014 (79)
- September 2014 (109)
- August 2014 (72)
- July 2014 (62)
- June 2014 (64)
- May 2014 (45)
- April 2014 (47)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (103)
- January 2014 (115)
- December 2013 (101)
- November 2013 (123)
- October 2013 (120)
- September 2013 (112)
- August 2013 (149)
- July 2013 (106)
- June 2013 (161)
- May 2013 (173)
- April 2013 (175)
- March 2013 (202)
- February 2013 (104)
- January 2013 (57)
- November 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (109)
- March 2012 (106)
- February 2012 (132)
- January 2012 (180)
- December 2011 (92)
- November 2011 (130)
- October 2011 (143)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (69)
- June 2011 (128)
- May 2011 (151)
- April 2011 (143)
- March 2011 (155)
- February 2011 (118)
- January 2011 (159)
- December 2010 (194)
- November 2010 (215)
- October 2010 (217)
- September 2010 (198)
- August 2010 (261)
- July 2010 (251)
- June 2010 (312)
- May 2010 (354)
- April 2010 (113)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.