Pages

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Re: [MedicalConspiracies] Obamacare: Doctors Will be Fined $100,000 or Jailed if they Put Patients First

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Grannie's <granniefox@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Lynda,
I had not had a chance to check this out, to see if it is for real or not, Anymore they are putting so much stuff that is not true, one never knows?  but I did find some links to your subject, I put them below your email.
Grannie

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Health_and_Healing] Fw: Obamacare: Doctors Will be Fined $100,000 or Jailed if they Put Patients First
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lynda Brasier <susoni@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-To: Health_and_Healing@yahoogroups.com






http://capoliticalnews.com/blog_post/show/6757

Obamacare: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First
Written by CA Political News on October 30, 2010, 04:07 PM


by Dr. Elaina George, big Government, 10/30/10



If Obamacare is completely implemented, doctors will no longer be practicing medicine. They will instead become the drones tasked with deciding who gets the meager healthcare crumbs doled out by the bureaucrats who have the ultimate power over patient life and death. Those who are deemed to have illnesses that require treatments which are not cost effective can expect a one way ticket to a hospice.



Like so many bills passed by Congress, there was a hidden provision in the Stimulus bill passed in 2009. It spends 1.1 billion dollars to create an important piece of the framework for the healthcare bill called the Coordinating Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research. It is based on the false premise that doctors in consultation with their patients don’t have the ability to make the right healthcare choices (see executive summary). The council consists of 15 people appointed by the President.



They all have one thing in commonâ€"they are all isolated from day to day patient care; and therefore, are insulated from the real practice of the art of medicine. It makes it easy to see patients as a cost center to be controlled. With views of members like Dr Emanuel, who champions the complete-lives system, it is hard to ignore the probability that senior citizens, those with chronic illness, and the very young will be on the outside looking in. This council is another example of the people of this country being told by the government that it knows what is best for us.



The framework set up by the stimulus bill merely set the stage for the implementation found in the healthcare reform bill. How can the government get doctors to participate in Obamacare thereby a) willingly destroying the doctor patient relationship, and b) betraying their Hippocratic Oath to provide treatments that they deem to be effective? Simple â€" fear and intimidation.



A second board created by the stimulus bill called The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology “will determine treatment at the time and place of care†. They are charged with deciding the course of treatment for the diagnosis given by the doctor. Now it becomes obvious why there has been a big push towards the implementation of universal electronic medical record use. It becomes a tool to completely control the physician and the patient. Those physicians and hospitals that choose to practice individualized patient care in consultation with their patients will be punished because they are not “meaningful users of the system over time.†Beginning January 1, 2013 penalties for doing the right thing for a patient will cost the doctor $100,000 for the first offense and jail for the second offense. This will have a chilling effect and may be the straw that completely breaks the foundation of good medicine â€" the doctor patient relationship.



46% of physiciansin a survey by The New England Journal of Medicine stated that they would leave the practice of medicine if Obamacare was implemented. This will only further decrease the quality of healthcare when the 30 million more people enter the system. Maybe that’s why there is a big push in the healthcare bill to increase the number of other providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners. There is no question that rationing will become our future. If you add 30 million more people into a system with fewer resources how could you possibly avoid rationing? Perhaps those members of Congress who passed this nightmare don’t care since they made sure that it wouldn’t apply to them.


  1. ObamaCare: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First

    Oct 30, 2010 ... If Obamacare is completely implemented, doctors will no longer be practicing medicine. They will instead become the drones tasked with ...
    visiontoamerica.org/.../obamacare-doctors-will-be-fined-or-jailed-if-they-put-patients-first.html - Cached

  2. » Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put ...

    Oct 30, 2010 ... Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First. by Dr. Elaina George. If Obamacare is completely implemented, ...
    biggovernment.com/.../obamacare-endgame-doctors-will-be-fined-or-jailed-if-they-put-patients-first/ - Cached

  3. Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First

    51 posts - 35 authors - Last post: yesterday
    Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First by Dr. Elaina George If Obamacare is completely implemented, ...
    www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2617816/posts - Cached

  4. Doctors will be Fined or Jailed if they put Patients first ...

    Senior Member. Visconti's Avatar. Join Date: Jun 2010. Posts: 3044. Thumbs down Doctors will be Fined or Jailed if they put Patients first ...
    acapella.harmony-central.com/showthread.php?p=41299059 - Cached

  5. Obamacare Endgame: Doctors will be fined or jailed under Obamacare ...

    Oct 30, 2010 ... Obamacare Endgame: Doctors will be fined or jailed under Obamacare if they put patients first. chipflip. follow, share. 1. Yesterday 9:24 PM ...
    clipmarks.com/.../5726C106-612F-4D5E-A303-0FEDE8A011C2/

  6. » Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put ...

    Oct 30, 2010 ... Beginning January 1, 2013 penalties for doing the right thing for a patient willcost the doctor $100000 for the first offense and jail for ...
    captkarl.blogivists.com/.../obamacare-endgame-doctors-will-be-fined-or- jailed-if-they-put-patients-first/

  7. Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put ...

    1 post - 1 author - Last post: yesterday
    Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put ... for a patient willcost the doctor $100000 for the first offense and jail ...
    forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=2107881 - Cached

  8. Medical Doctor Points Out That Doctors Will Be Fined Or Jailed If ...

    Oct 30, 2010 ... ObamaCare Endgame: Doctors Will Be Fined Or Jailed If They Put Patients First by Dr. Elaina George. If Obamacare is completely implemented, ...
    startthinkingright.wordpress.com/.../medical-doctor-points-out-that-doctors- will-be-fined-or-jailed-if-they-put-patients-first-under-obamacare/

  9. Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients ...

    Obamacare Endgame: Doctors Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First ... obama is looney to say the least....he is planning on a system that will wipe out ...
    www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=16221047 - Cached

  10. Obamacare: Doctors Will be Fined $100,00 or Jailed if they Put ...

    Obamacare: Doctors Will be Fined $100,00 or Jailed if they Put Patients First. Posted By: Susoni Date: Saturday, 30-Oct-2010 20:00:47 ...
    www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=186176 - Cached


«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

§ Health_and_Healing - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE & WORLD NEWS

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Health_and_Healing
Subscribe send email to: Health_and_Healing-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

DETOX WITH ALL NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL   http://clayadvantage.com/

THE OPEN LINE NEWSPAPER, HEALTH NEWS, SPIRITUAL, ENVIRONMENT, ETC. http://WWW.THEOPENLINE.ORG 

ENERGY HEALING TECHNIQUE FOR CHRONIC PAIN, PTSD & OTHER ISSUES THAT TROUBLE YOU.  http://vibrantenergy.webs.com


--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
 
DETOX WITH All NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL http://clayadvantage.com/
 
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related, purely
speculation or SOMEONE'S OPINION. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
By becoming a member of this group you AGREE to hold this group its members, list owners, moderators and affiliates harmless of any liability for any direct, or indirect consequential, incidental, damage incurred.
 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE

--
To subscribe: MedicalConspiracies-subscribe@googlegroups.com
 
DETOX WITH All NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL http://clayadvantage.com/
 
Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related, purely
speculation or SOMEONE'S OPINION. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
By becoming a member of this group you AGREE to hold this group its members, list owners, moderators and affiliates harmless of any liability for any direct, or indirect consequential, incidental, damage incurred.
 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Posted by Medical at 10:55 PM 0 comments

[MedicalConspiracies] FREE ENERGY (OT)

For Info.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: JamesG
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:06 AM
Subject: [ECETI News] FREE ENERGY

 

If there is anyone who wants to build this device and upscale it with a larger antennae we would love to work with you to get ECETI off the grid. Will provide parts and supplies
http://www.teslasecret.com/?hop=josper54

Posted by Medical at 9:58 PM 0 comments

[MedicalConspiracies] There was never a constitutional amendment that gave the federal government authority to regulate the drug or hemp

Thanks Richard for the info, I put some links to this subject below, Grannie

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Health_and_Healing] Hemp Is the Far Bigger Economic Issue Hiding Behind Legal Marijuana
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Muszynski <frog_rider88@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Health_and_Healing@yahoogroups.com


Greetings. thought i would add that there was never a constitutional amendment that gave the federal government authority to regulate the drug or hemp market and make it banned. with alcohol they had to have the Volksted act to allow them to declare alcohol illegal. with hemp and marijuana there was no such amendment.  so the ban on hemp is illegal it was never authorized by amendment to our constitution. check you will see what i mean.  the chemical corps had just come out with a more expensive way to use wood to make paper that involved heavy use of chemicals that now pollute our waters, as well as synthetic fabrics like nylon and paid senators and congressmen to ban hemp.  hemp requires no harmful chemicals to be made into paper and fabric.  wood fibers need to be broken down with sulphuric acid and bleached with chlorine.  in any illegal act on the detective shows they say "follow the dollar and you will find the guilty" do it with hemp and it leads right back to the chemical corporations.  Rich.

--- On Sun, 10/24/10, Grannie's <GrannieFox@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Grannie's <GrannieFox@gmail.com>
Subject: [Health_and_Healing] Hemp Is the Far Bigger Economic Issue Hiding Behind Legal Marijuana
To: "1 Health_and_Healing@yahoogroups" <Health_and_Healing@yahoogroups.com>, "1 MedicalConspiracies@googlegrou" <MedicalConspiracies@googlegroups.com>, "1 Paranormal_Research@yahoogroups.com" <Paranormal_Research@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 3:41 AM

 
Hemp Is the Far Bigger Economic Issue Hiding Behind Legal Marijuana
Prop 19 will open up California to hemp, a multi-billion-dollar crop that has been a staple of human agriculture for thousands of years.
October 19, 2010  | 

 
Hemp is the far bigger economic issue hiding behind legal marijuana.
If the upcoming pot legalization ballot in California were decided by hemp farmers like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, it would be no contest. For purely economic reasons, if you told the Constitutional Convention in 1787 that the nation they were founding would someday make hemp illegal, they would have laughed you out of the room.
If California legalizes pot, it will save the state millions in avoided legal and imprisonment costs, while raising it millions in taxes.
But with legal marijuana will come legal hemp. That will open up the Golden State to a multi-billion-dollar crop that has been a staple of human agriculture for thousands of years, and that could save the farms of thousands of American families.
Hemp is currently legal in Canada, Germany, Holland, Rumania, Japan and China, among many other countries. It is illegal here largely because of marijuana prohibition. Ask any sane person why HEMP is illegal and you will get a blank stare.
For paper, clothing, textiles, rope, sails, fuel and food, hemp has been a core crop since the founding of ancient China, India and Arabia. Easy to plant, grow and harvest, farmers---including Washington and Jefferson---have sung its praises throughout history. It was the number one or two cash crop on virtually all American family farms from the colonial era on.
If the American Farm Bureaus and Farmers Unions were truly serving their constituents, they would be pushing hard for legal pot so that its far more profitable (but essentially unsmokable) cousin could again bring prosperity to American farmers.
Hemp may be the real reason marijuana is illegal. In the 1930s, the Hearst family set out to protect their vast timber holdings, much of which were being used to make paper.
But hemp produces five times as much paper per acre as do trees. Hemp paper is stronger and easier to make. The Declaration of Independence was written on hemp paper, and one of Benjamin Franklin’s primary paper mills ran on it.
But the Hearsts used their newspapers to incite enough reefer madness to get marijuana banned in 1937. With that ban came complex laws that killed off the growing of hemp. The ecological devastation that’s followed with continued use of trees for paper has been epic.
As canvass, hemp has long been essential for shoes, clothing, rope, sails, textiles, building materials and much more. It’s far more durable than cotton and ecologically benign compared to virtually any other industrial crop. Hemp needs no pesticides, herbicides or chemical fertilizers, and can grow well without much water.
Hemp’s use for rope was so critical to the US war effort that in the 1940s, the US military the bans and blanketed virtually the entire state of Kansas with it.The War Department’s “Hemp for Victory†is the core film on how to grow it.
Henry Ford produced an entire automobile made from hemp fiber stiffened with resin. Like the original diesel engine, it was designed to run on hemp fuel.

  1. Hemp Freedom Act – Tenth Amendment Center

    ... local legislation can never be desirable cases of a general jurisdiction. ... (6) The assumption of power that the Federal Government through its Drug ... prohibiting industrialhemp farming exceeds its Constitutional authority and ... the People of the State of ______ to regulate agriculture as they see fit, ...
    www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/.../hemp-freedom-act/ - Cached
    ►

  2. Political positions of Ron Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    He has called for a new Constitutional amendment to revise fourteenth ...... do not grant thefederal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion, ..... This bill would give the states the power to regulate farming of hemp. ... We have non-violent drug offenders doing life sentences, and there is no room ...
    en.wikipedia.org/.../Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul - Cached - Similar

  3. Statements on Medical Marijuana from 2002 House Poll - Medical ...

    Jan 5, 2009 ... Drug prohibition is a disaster as well...and there was never an amendmentin any event. ... THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PUNISH .... that give the Federal Government the authority to regulate what ... It took a constitutional amendment to outlaw the ownership of ...
    medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?...992 - Cached

  4. Why is Marijuana Illegal? - Drug WarRant

    Those who voted on the legal fate of this plant never had the facts, ... The earliest known woven fabric was apparently of hemp, and over the ... It was considered at the time that thefederal government did not have the ... It is because of this that alcohol prohibition required a constitutional amendment. ...
    www.drugwarrant.com/articles/why-is-marijuana-illegal/ - Cached - Similar

  5. Drug Legalization and the Right to Control Your Body | Britannica Blog

    Oct 25, 2010 ... But we have never passed a constitutional amendment granting the federal... the focus to the government—to the source, if any, of its authority. ... does the federal government find the power to ban or regulate drugs? ..... No doubt God gave us freedom of choice….but with choice come consequences. ...
    www.britannica.com/.../drug-legalization-and-the-right-to-control-your-body / - Cached

  6. Former Mexican president on California marijuana legalization ...

    Oct 29, 2010 ... The Hearst family destroyed the production of Hemp in order to protect their wood holdings. .... that government doesn't need the express authority to regulate drugs. ....because it took a constitutional amendment to make alcohol ... and that is "under whatauthority does the Federal Government ...
    www.rawstory.com/.../mexican-president-california-marijuana-legalization- may-god-pass/ -Cached

  7. The drug war and controlling your own body | SmallGovTimes.com

    Oct 26, 2010 ... There are many reasons to end the war on drugs and relegalize substances... The federal government's contemporary prohibition policy is an illegal ... does thefederal government find the power to ban or regulate drugs? ... But we have never passed a constitutional amendment granting the federal ...
    www.smallgovtimes.com/.../the-drug-war-and-controlling-your-own-body/ - Cached

  8. Q: Where does the Constitution authorize the federal government to ...

    Jun 24, 2010 ... I think this was my favorite moment from the John Stossel drug war show last week. ... It was not via the commerce clause, but via a constitutional amendment . ....There is no constitutional authority for the war on drugs. ..... Please note that it does notgive authority to regulate commerce within ...
    reason.com/blog/2010/06/24/q-where-does-the-constitution - Cached

  9. The War on Drugs and the Constitution

    The Federal government shouldn't be waging a war on drugs. ... and had never entered Interstate Commerce, Congress could nonetheless regulate a ... in lieu of anything acceptable under the Sixth Amendment, drug testing in schools, .... In 1937, the Marijuana Transfer Tax Act was passed in order to destroy the hemp ...
    www.jeremiahproject.com/trashingamerica/war-on-drugs.html - Cached - Similar

  10. frontline: drug wars: discussion

    Only the People can do that, via a constitutional amendment. In fact, the government-sponsored treatment for drugs also was never constitutionally authorized. ... There is, it seems to me, another problem with the war on drugs, ... lab which was raided by Columbianauthorities and U.S. drug agents and which was ...
    www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/talk/ - Cached - Similar

«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

§ Health_and_Healing - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE & WORLD NEWS

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Health_and_Healing
Subscribe send email to: Health_and_Healing-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

DETOX WITH ALL NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL   http://clayadvantage.com/

THE OPEN LINE NEWSPAPER, HEALTH NEWS, SPIRITUAL, ENVIRONMENT, ETC. http://WWW.THEOPENLINE.ORG 

ENERGY HEALING TECHNIQUE FOR CHRONIC PAIN, PTSD & OTHER ISSUES THAT TROUBLE YOU.  http://vibrantenergy.webs.com


Posted by Medical at 9:53 PM 0 comments

[MedicalConspiracies] How to spot a liar (OT)



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Paranormal_Research] How to spot a liar
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:14:55 +1300
From: Misty <misty8@xtra.co.nz>
Reply-To: Paranormal_Research@yahoogroups.com




How to spot a liar.

Share This Site

http://www.viewzone.com/liarx..html
by Nguyen Tam
 

We have all met people who were dishonest and avoided eye contact. It has been said that "the eyes are the mirror if the soul." Many people know that their eyes betray their lies. Some try to conceal the truth by wearing sunglasses of looking down at the ground.

Eventually, you will confront someone and need to know if they are being honest. It may be a friend, a family member or an employee. Police have established a method of evaluating the truthfulness of a person by watching the movements of their eyes. It's not an exact science by any means, and it can be manipulated by a skilled criminal or a seasoned liar, but is it generally accepted as a good indicator of honesty.

The following are some general patterns that you can use when talking to someone. It shows the various directions of eye movements of a person and explains what is usually going on in their mind at that moment. It illustrates that a glance to the observer's left usually reveals a creative process -- when someone is "making up" facts or lying. A glance to the observer's right reveals that the subject is remembering facts.

Here is a more detailed explanation of this method:

Up and to the Left: Indicates a visually constructed Images. If you asked someone to "Imagine an ice cream sundae with a red cherry on top", this would be the direction their eyes moved. In their mind they are "Visually Constructing" an ice cream sundae with a cherry in their mind.

Up and to the Right: Indicates a Visually Remembered Images. If you asked someone to "What color shirt or blouse did you wear yesterday?", this would be the direction their eyes moved. In their mind they are "Visually Remembering" the color.

< center>

To the Left: Indicates an Auditory Construct thought. If you asked someone to "Try and ceate the sound of a speeding train in your head", this would be the direction their eyes moved. In their mind they are imagining and creating the sound of a speeding train.

To the Right: Indicates an Auditory Memory. If you asked someone to "Remember what the National Anthem sounds like", this would be the direction their eyes moved in while remembering the song.

Down and to the Left: Indicates a Feeling / Kinesthetic / Sensory impression that is being created. If you asked someone to "Can you remember the taste of chocolate?", this would be the direction their eyes moved in while they recalled a smell, feeling, or taste of eating chocolate.

Down and To the Right: Indicates an Internal Dialog. This is the direction of someone's eyes as they "talk to themselves."

How to use this information to detect a lie?

Let's say that you have a friend who owes you some money. You have heard that they just got paid and you want to suggest that they pay you back. You try to be polite and ask them, "Did you get paid yet?" They answer, "Gee, not yet. The boss said maybe next week." and look to their right (your left). This would indicate that they are constructing or "making up" what their boss said. They are telling a lie.

Police often ask a suspect to describe someone in detail. If the suspect looks to their right (your left) they are generally constructing or "making up" the visual description. If they look to their left (your right) they are generally recalling the details from their visual memory.

So, in general, a glance to your left when observing a person indicates that they are creating or "lying" while a glance to your right signifies that they are remembering an actual event, or being "truthful."

But there's more to the story...

Another thing that forensic interrogators look for is the use of contractions -- words like isn't, doesn't, weren't, etc. These usually are used by people telling the truth. On the other hand, people who say is not, does not, were not, etc. are often lying.

They also look for the reactions and facial expressions that accompany what the person is talking about. If someone says "I'm so sad that it happened!" but there is a delay in their expession of sadness, they are probably not being honest. The example is often given of someone who receives a present that they don't like. They often respond with "Wow. It's beautiful, I love it!" and then, some few seconds later, they smile and appear to look happy. Truthful emotions are spontaneous and instantaneous.

Another method used by professionals is to change the subject. A person who has been telling lies about a particular event will welcome the change of topic and will be visibly relaxed. An innocent suspect or a person who has been telling the truth will usually want to continue the dialog and will find the change of topic puzzling and attempt to regain focus on the topic.

Body language is also a good thing to observe. Liars usually do not use their hands. They often fold their arms together in front of them or poition items such as books, cups or other things between themselves and the person asking the questions. Sometimes they touch their mouth or nose alot.

Some investigators say that long and detailed answers to otherwise simple questions can indicate a lie. It's as if the more detail the person gives the more he tries to convince the questioner that he is being truthful. If they are confronted or acused of something, the liar will usually deny the accusation in a calm and emotionless manner instead of getting excited and saying things like "What? You think I did it?"

With careful video analysis, some investigators can observe rapid twitches in facial muscles that indicate a lie. Poker players, who want to leave with the most poker chips, often learn to "read" the facial expressions or "ticks" of other players to determine if they hold a good hand of cards or are just "bluffing."

SEE Shifting eyes reveal your poker face!

To become adept at distinguishing lies, ask some neutral questions to establish the baseline of the subject. Watch their facial expressions and eye movements and test this method by asking questions and observing the pattern of shifts to left, right, up and down.

A word of caution: this method may be reversed in left-handed people. It also may not apply to people who have rehearsed their answers or who have taken drugs or consumed alcohol.

Update: Blood in cheeks reveals liars

Many people blush when they are telling a lie. It's a very subtle phenomenon but this slight increase of blood flow to the cheeks can be detected. A camera that detects liars by monitoring the temperature of their face could lead to more acurate detection of terrorists and illegals at airports and border crossings.

Norman Eberhardt and James Levine of the Mayo Clinic and Ioannis Pavlidis of Honeywell Laboratories, both in Minnesota, have developed the high-resolution thermal imaging camera. This can identify an instant rush of blood to the area around the eyes, a phenomenon that has been linked with lying.

In the image on the top [right] the normal blood flow pattern can be seen and contrasted with the increased blood flow (bottom image) of a peron who is lying.

The temperature of the eye region can rise by several degrees. However, the thermal camera needs to be many times more sensitive to detect this change accurately at a distance. In tests the system picked out liars with comparable accuracy to conventional polygraph equipment, which is more complicated and time consuming to use. This method is just beginning to be used in forensic environments and holds promise for the future.

Other CSI related stories: Understanding Fingerprints.

 

Also: We can all know the future!
(Well... at least a few hours of it anyway. Thanks to a computerized black box.) by Dan Eden.


Comments:

Hi,
I tried using this method when watching Bush give a speech before the Iraq war. He looked to the left (his right) every time he talked about weapons of mass destruction. Check it our yourself. I'm now watching the questioning of Gonzales and it's true for him also. Thanks for the interesting facts.

Glen C.

Hi,
I found a good way to use this when I questioned my boyfriend. I asked him to tell me if he remembered a friends house and asked him to describe it. I watched his eyes move to his left. Then I asked him (later) if he really was with his buddy on Friday. He answered "yes" and so I asked him what they did and I saw that he looked to his right. I know for a fact that he was at a party because my girlfriend saw him there and he didn't invite me.

I think this works ok on long answers but not probably for just "Yes" and "no" questions. You have to ask someone to explain the "yes" or "no" and then watch carefully. But it DOES work. Thanks.

Marcie D.

I don't know about anyone else but this really works. I have watched my friends and people I work with and it's right on target. You cannot just ask yes or no questions though. You have to ask details about something and then you can tell if they are making it up or really remembering it. The part about changing the subject is also true. Liars are always happy to talk about something else. Great article. Thanlks.
metl556@---

Hi
This article and the one about the finger lengths is a great way to tell lots about people without them knowing. I tried it with a left handed person and it was opposite. I found out by asking questions that I knew were true or false and then carefully watched his eyes. So its important to know left or right hand.
rr

Yeah, agree with above about the finger thing. I'd like to know more about body language and whether a person is telling a lie. Maybe things like crossing arms and playing with cup or glass... thanks.
HGJ

The future article was good and explained that we are always half a second behind true reality time! So in that half second we can make up stuff to tell if we are dishonest. Made me think about what is real.
anonymous

The future article weirded me out for a while. Like we TIVO reality! Crazy, man. If it's true then it's a real mind blower. Kudos for the heads up.
Brownie

Hi, I found your article interesting but the first section about eye movements is misleading. Being a Practitioner in NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) I can tell you that the specific patterns you describe can vary between people to such an extent that they may even make the opposite movements or hardly move their eyes at all. What is important is to "calibrate" first: That is, by asking a few questions you can see where their eyes move and recognise which way corresponds to construction or memory for that person. Questions such as "did you see anything interesting on television last night" prompts a visual memory response and "I wonder what your friends would say" evokes an auditory construction response. Only after a few questions, testing and re-testing, are you then in a position to start to make reasonable conclusions. Without "calibration" and plenty of experience in using this technique you are highly likely to make incorrect and damaging judgements about the other person. Yours,

Patrick

Now you see, this is "exactly" why intelligent people never get caught, they rehearse until it becomes "autonomic" when being confronted by an individual in interrogation.. I can easily fool anyone I choose to and I really like to upset the normal expectations by keeping my eyes focused upon theirs without moving them at all.. Body language is old news.. its easy to fool someone, and the way you accomplish that is by using the "devil may care" attitude when being interrogated... eyes are accomplished by using "forward mental projection", that is by placing the object, situation, sound, or sensory event in "front" of you moving away or toward you (to keep it interesting) the eyes remain locked to the one doing the questioning "hence" it becomes impractical as a tool of observation.

I surely love the "game" of subterfuge, as it truly is a fun thing to master and watch the lack of evidence pile up on the other end. If you become a master at it, you can get into a "zone" were you may not be fully aware of the entire event that just transpired until after it happens (which the downside is, you have to repeat in your head the entire scenario until it become a moving picture which is then capable of being recalled at a moments notice if asked again).

As far as the blood rush thing they think will help? .. sure, the average joe is in an SOL situation, but if you really use the "devil may care" attitude or in another phrase "Damed if I do, Damned if I don't" mentality, your heart rate remains as cool as ice cold water...

James

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»
Paranormal_Research - Scientific Data,
Health Conspiracies & Anything Strange

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paranormal_Research
Subscribe:... Paranormal_Research-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

DETOX WITH ALL NATURAL PURE GREEN CALCIUM BENTONITE CLAY USED INTERNAL/EXTERNAL   http://clayadvantage.com/

THE OPEN LINE NEWSPAPER, HEALTH NEWS, SPIRITUAL, ENVIRONMENT, ETC. http://WWW.THEOPENLINE.ORG

RELAXATION TECHNIQUE FOR CHRONIC PAIN, PTSD + OTHER ISSUES THAT TROUBLE YOU.   http://relaxationheals.webs.com


Posted by Medical at 9:43 PM 0 comments